The Law Just Caught Up to AI: What New York's New Likeness Rules Mean for Creators
Two New York laws now govern when your face, voice, and likeness can be synthesized or replaced by AI. Here's what they actually do, what they don't, and why every working creator should care.
If you make a living with your face or your voice, acting, voice work, streaming, music, modeling, content, the rules that govern who gets to copy you just changed. On June 9, 2026, New York's synthetic-performer disclosure law took effect. It's the first law of its kind in the United States, and it's part of a pair of New York measures that, together, mark a real shift: the law is finally starting to catch up to what AI can already do to a likeness.
This is a plain-language read on what actually changed, what it covers, and, just as important, what it doesn't. No legalese, no fear-selling. Just the picture as it stands, for the people it affects most.
Two laws, two different jobs
New York didn't pass one AI-likeness law. It passed two, and they do different things. Conflating them is the most common mistake we see in the coverage, so let's keep them straight.
1. The Synthetic Performer Disclosure Law (effective June 9, 2026). This one amends New York's General Business Law and requires advertisers to conspicuously disclose when an ad uses an AI-generated 'synthetic performer', a digitally fabricated human figure designed to look like a real person performing, but who isn't any identifiable, real individual. Think the AI 'models' increasingly used in e-commerce and social ads instead of hiring a human. If that fabricated figure appears in an ad that reaches a New York audience, the brand and its production partners now have to say so, on the ad.
2. The Posthumous Right of Publicity Expansion (effective December 11, 2025). This is the one that protects real, identifiable people. It expands New York's right-of-publicity law to require consent from heirs or executors before a deceased person's name, voice, signature, photograph, or AI-generated likeness is used commercially, with specific protections for 'deceased performers.' For estates, legacy artists, and the families who manage them, this is the bigger deal.
Here's the distinction that matters for you as a creator: the disclosure law is fundamentally about protecting the audience from being fooled by a fake person. The publicity law is about protecting a real person's likeness from being used without permission. Both are progress. Only one of them is squarely about your rights to your own face.
What the disclosure law actually requires
The mechanics are narrower than the headlines suggest, and the details are worth knowing:
- It applies by reach, not by headquarters. Any company whose ad reaches New York consumers is covered, no matter where the advertiser is based. In practice, that's most national campaigns.
- It's triggered by 'actual knowledge.' Advertisers and agencies who knowingly use a synthetic performer must disclose it.
- The penalties are civil, not criminal: $1,000 for a first violation, $5,000 for each one after. Enforcement is expected to rest with the state, and the law does not create an express right for an individual to sue directly over a missing disclosure.
- There are real carve-outs. Audio-only ads, AI used purely for translation, and marketing for expressive works like films, shows, and games (where the synthetic performer also appears in the underlying work) are excluded. Platforms that merely host ads, networks, streamers, publishers, are exempt.
That last point is why this is best understood as a transparency law, not a likeness-protection law. It doesn't stop anyone from generating a synthetic performer. It requires them to label it.
Why creators should still care, a lot
It would be easy to read the fine print and shrug. Don't. Here's why this matters even with the carve-outs:
It's the first crack in the wall. A year ago, there was effectively no law on the books treating an AI-generated performer as something a consumer deserves to be told about. Now there is, in the largest media market in the country, and it was strongly supported by SAG-AFTRA, the union that has been fighting precisely this fight on behalf of working performers. When the country's biggest performers' union backs a transparency law, it sets a direction other states tend to follow.
Disclosure changes economics. When a brand has to stamp 'AI-generated performer' on an ad, the synthetic option loses some of its quiet advantage. Transparency makes the choice between a real human and a fabricated one visible, and that visibility is something working performers have been asking for.
The two laws together signal where this is heading. Read side by side, New York is saying: audiences deserve to know when a person is fake, and real people deserve to control their likeness, even after death. The gap that remains, robust, enforceable protection for a living creator's likeness against unauthorized AI use in everyday content, is the next frontier. It's coming. The direction is set.
What this means for you, practically
You don't need to become a lawyer. But a few things are worth doing now:
- Know which law does what. If someone tells you 'New York made deepfakes illegal,' you now know it's more specific than that. Precision protects you.
- If you're an estate or manage a legacy, the posthumous law is live now. Consent from heirs or executors is required for commercial use of a deceased person's likeness, including AI versions. That's an immediate, enforceable right.
- If you're a working creator, start with awareness of where your likeness already lives. The laws are catching up, but enforcement starts with knowing a problem exists. You can't act on a misuse you have not seen yet.
That third point is the quiet one. Most creators have not actually checked where their face or voice is already showing up across the open web, authorized or not. The law gives you new ground to stand on; knowing what's out there is how you decide whether you need it.
This is where we'll say the one honest thing about us: AURA built a free scan that searches the open web for where your face may already be appearing, and returns it as a priority list to review, not a verdict and not a promise, just a starting point. If you have not looked before, it's a free way to see. That's the only ask in this piece. The rest is yours to use however you like.
The Likeness Ledger is AURA's reporting on identity, AI likeness, consent, and the rights of the people behind the work. This article is written for general information and is not legal advice; for guidance on your situation, consult a qualified attorney.
Sources
- New York Enacts 'Synthetic Performer' Disclosure Law for Advertisements (Cooley) · law firm analysis
- Synthetic Performers, Real Consequences (Crowell & Moring) · law firm analysis
- New York Synthetic Performer Law: What Advertisers Need to Know (Manatt) · law firm analysis
- NY Assembly Bill A8887-B (full text) · primary source
- Two Newly Enacted New York Laws Will Regulate AI-Generated Images (Skadden) · law firm analysis
- AI Legal Updates: Synthetic Performer Transparency (Davis+Gilbert): SAG-AFTRA support · law firm analysis
- Governor Hochul announces synthetic-performer disclosure law in effect (NY Governor's Office) · primary source
The Likeness Ledger is informational reporting and analysis, not legal advice. It does not create an attorney–client relationship. For decisions about your specific situation, consult a qualified professional.